Register Here
Delegates
Sponsorship
  Call For Papers
Speakers
Schedule
Sponsors
Exhibitors
  Sessions
  Videos
  Power Panels
  Presentations
Untitled Document
2018 East Exhibitors

Untitled Document
2018 East Media Sponsors








Untitled Document
2017 West
Premium Sponsors
Diamond



Platinum
@DevOpsSummit

Bronze










Untitled Document
2017 West
Keynote Sponsor


Untitled Document
2017 West Exhibitors
























@ThingsExpo











Untitled Document
2017 West JETRO ×
Six Prefectures
of Japan
Pavilion Exhibitors



















Untitled Document
2017 West Media Sponsors














Untitled Document
2017 East
Premium Sponsors
Diamond



Platinum
@DevOpsSummit

@DevOpsSummit

Silver
@DevOpsSummit


Bronze










Untitled Document
2017 East Exhibitors
@DevOpsSummit




































Untitled Document
2017 East Media Sponsors
















Untitled Document
   
  Think Big – Now Think Even Bigger
  Join Us at Internet of Things at Cloud Expo, November 11-13,
at the Javits Center!


The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.

All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades.

With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend Internet of Things at Cloud Expo in New York City. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be!

Delegates to Internet of Things at Cloud Expo will be able to attend eight separate, information-packed tracks:

  • Enterprise Cloud
  • Digital Transformation
  • The API Enterprise | Mobility & Security
  • DevOps | Containers & Microservices
  • Cognitive Computing | AI, ML, DL
  • Big Data | Analytics
  • IoT | IIoT | Smart Cities
  • Hot Topics | FinTech | WebRTC

There are 120 breakout sessions in all, with Keynotes, General Sessions, and Power Panels adding to three days of incredibly rich presentations and content.


We'll see you in New York!



Day 3 Keynote at @ThingsExpo | Chris Matthieu, CTO of Octoblu
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu's platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
  Themes & Topics to Be Discussed

Consumer IoT
• Wearables
• Smart Appliances
• Smart Cars
• Smartphones 2.0
• Automation
• Smart Travel
• Personal Fitness
• Health Care
• Personalized Marketing
• Customized Shopping
• Personal Finance
• The Digital Divide
• Mobile Cash & Markets
• Games & The IoT
• The Future of Education
• Virtual Reality

Enterprise IoT
• The Business Case for
x IoT
• Smart Grids
• Smart Cities
• Smart Transportation
• The Smart Home
• M2M
• Authentication/Security
• Wiring the IoT
• The Internet of
x Everything
• Digital Transformation
x of Enterprise IT
• Agriculture
• Transportation
• Manufacturing
• Local & State
x Government
• Federal Government

IoT Developers | WebRTC Summit
• Eclipse Foundation
• Cloud Foundry
• Linux Containers
• Node-Red
• Open Source Hardware
• Ajax and the IoT
• Leveraging SOA
• Multi-Cloud IoT
• Evolving Standards
• WebSockets
• Security & Privacy
x Protocols
• GPS & Proximity
x Services
• Bluetooth/RFID/etc
• XMPP
• Nest Labs



The Top Keynotes, the Best Sessions, a Rock Star Faculty and the Most Qualified Delegates of ANY Internet of Things Event!


The future of computing lies in these things. As computing takes a much more active role in our lives it will at the same time become much more invisible. Internet of Things Expo will address the challenges in getting from where we are today to this future.
 
The high-energy event is a must-attend for senior technologists from CEOs on down – including CIOs, CTOs, directors of infrastructure, VPs of technology, IT directors and managers, network and storage managers, network engineers, enterprise architects, and communications and networking specialists.




@ThingsExpo Power Panel | The World's Many IoTs: Which Are the Most Important?
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Benefits of Attending the Three-Day Technical Program
  LEARNexactly why Internet of Things is relevant today from an economic, business and technology standpoint.
  HEAR first-hand from industry experts the common issues and requirements for creating a platform for the Internet of Things.
  SEE what new tools and approaches the Internet of Things requires.
  DISCOVER how to drive a distributed approach to the Internet of Things, where applications move to the data.
  FIND OUThow the vast volumes of new data produced by the Internet of Things provides a valuable new source of business insight through advanced analytical techniques.
  MASTER how the ongoing development of smart cities, cars, and houses will enhance connectivity infrastructure.
Lunch Power Panel | Microservices & IoT- Moderated by Jason Bloomberg
In this Power Panel at @DevOpsSummit, moderated by Jason Bloomberg, president of Intellyx, panelists Roberto Medrano, Executive Vice President at Akana; Lori MacVittie, Evangelist for F5 Networks; and Troy Topnik, ActiveState's Technical Product Manager; and Otis Gospodnetic, founder of Sematext; peeled away the buzz and discuss the important architectural principles behind implementing IoT solutions for the enterprise. As remote IoT devices and sensors become increasingly intelligent, they become part of our distributed cloud environment, and we must architect and code accordingly. At the very least, you'll have no problem filling in your buzzword bingo cards.


The UserLinux GUI Will Be GNOME - "By Fiat" Says Perens
The UserLinux GUI Will Be GNOME - "By Fiat" Says Perens

On the GUI Selection in UserLinux

By Bruce Perens

[reproduced from the UserLinux site]

Version 0.1, December 15, 2003.

In the original UserLinux white paper, I made it clear that the project would play favorites among the software choices available to it, and that the resulting process would be painful. You can't say that you weren't warned. But it turns out not to be particularly painful, except for one issue: the selection of the GUI used in the system. The selection of GNOME as the GUI of the UserLinux project has raised a good deal of opposition from KDE supporters.

GNOME and KDE are both Free Software. Both are developed by lots of good programmers, with the support of honorable business people. Many people in the Free Software community have a huge emotional (or even financial) investment in KDE or GNOME, because they have put a lot of development into one of those desktops, or they've just spent a lot of time with one of them as a user.

To many of those people, it's simply unbearable for their personal GUI not to be the one chosen for our project.

Why play favorites at all? Debian doesn't, and UserLinux is to be derived from Debian. There are more than 13,000 software packages in Debian's pre-release at this writing, including at least three complete desktop GUIs: KDE, GNOME, and GNUStep. The FreeDesktop.org site hosts efforts to increase inter-operability between GNOME and KDE, and the Red Hat Bluecurve project has created a theme that makes the two GUIs look identical. Applications from KDE and GNOME run reasonably well together today. And most important: non-programmer users don't care what GUI toolkit their application is built upon. The GUI issue is a developer, not user, discussion.

But all of the efforts to unify these two desktops do not change the fact that there are two entirely different GUI SDKs. The two competing GUIs are each of a complexity equal to or greater than that of the Linux kernel. For developers and support staff, maintaining expertise in both of two GUIs is an expensive proposition. Many IT shops, when faced with such choices, have decided to consolidate to fewer options in order to reduce expense.

UserLinux is intended to be a system for business people. Central to its design is a network of competing for-profit service providers, who perform engineering and support services for the system. Because these service providers are basing their business upon a commodity product, there are already economic limits upon how profitable they can be. The difference between one and two GUIs may spell profitability or bankruptcy for some of our service providers. In a similar vein, internal support and engineering staff at businesses that employ UserLinux would like to have only one GUI SDK to develop for and maintain. This is not to say that choice is bad. Rather, it's bad when people aren't allowed to choose.

"GNOME and KDE...are of equal technical merit"

We held about a week of discussion on the GUI issue, on the UserLinux mailing list - about 200 postings. It drowned out all other work. It was clear from the discussion that while GNOME and KDE each exceed the other in some areas, when you weigh them all together they are of equal technical merit. However there is a critical business difference between the two GUIs: GNOME does not require a royalty in connection with proprietary software development based upon their SDK. Qt, the widget set upon which KDE is based, does have a proprietary developer licensing fee connected with it.

It's important for us to get more Free Software into business, so that businesses will be sympathetic with us when we need to ask for legislative changes to support the long-term viability of Free Software. You know the issues: software patents, DRM, etc. Today these are seen as business vs. fringe-party issues, and we're on the losing side. The extent to which our software penetrates the business world will govern our effectiveness in getting the legislative changes we need.

Enterprise users buy solutions, not systems. And it's a fact of life that enterprise customers will want to run a mixed Free + proprietary environment, choosing whatever software is best for a particular application. The overall viability of UserLinux will be based upon the size and quality of the ecosystem of solutions around it, both Free and proprietary. So, in order to get any Free Software into businesses, our Free system must promote the creation of a large collection of proprietary solutions that do not exist today. As we penetrate the enterprise, we will continue to move Free Software higher up the application stack, until these businesses make use of Free Software predominantly. But you need proprietary software to get in the door.

It is possible for us to make our system entirely royalty-free for solution developers, both Free and proprietary. This dictates some software choices: GNOME and PostgreSQL rather than KDE and MySQL, simply because of the way those products license proprietary developers. This will support a large ecosystem of both Free and proprietary solution developers by lowering the financial barriers to entry all the way to zero. This will be especially important in third-world countries, where the expense of an SDK license is much more significant than to a developer in the US or Europe.

Almost all Linux distributions have been quiet about their GUI choice, because it does seem to make a few enemies and might dissuade some customers who have already made their own GUI choice. I felt that attempting to be everything to everyone would be the coward's choice and the worst possible decision, that focus would be appreciated by business users, and that most business users don't have any GUI preference other than wanting to be able to focus development and support on only one GUI. Thus, it would be necessary to select one GUI.

As you can see on our mailing list, most of the software consolidation in UserLinux is going on by consensus. I saw that no consensus would be possible regarding the GUI. So, I made a decision by fiat to get the project moving past the GUI issue. UserLinux will be GNOME-based, will not include Qt or KDE components by default, and we'll make it known that project policy is to develop for, and support GNOME. Obviously, this caused much emotion: while the formal proposal of the KDE group was polite, there has been a large amount of personal abuse on the mailing list. But there is little reason for the emotion. The decision does not prevent anyone from using KDE and Qt components on UserLinux, does not prevent anyone from installing those components from the Debian packages, and does not prevent any of our support providers from formally supporting KDE. It doesn't take any choice away from users, who can get KDE on our platform or elsewhere.

The plan presented by the KDE supporters is a good one, and I would encourage them to go ahead with it, using a Debian base. We'll have no problem sharing work with them, just as they share work through FreeDesktop.org and Debian today. But the decision to base UserLinux on GNOME stands. Further personal abuse will be ignored as cheerfully as it has been for the past week, I've had a decade of practice at that and do it really well now. It would be nice if people would allow the mailing list contributors to continue to work on non-GUI issues, by not spamming the list with GUI partisanship.

"I am not an anti-Qt ogre."

In February, my book series will publish C++ GUI Programming with Qt, the official Trolltech guide to Qt 3.2, by Jasmin Blanchette and Mark Summerfield. I have a minor financial interest in promoting Qt (I don't make much money from my books), but no such interest in the case of GTK/GNOME at this time. Because of a miscommunication with my publisher, there is some non-free software on the CD attached to that book - Windows Qt and some compilers from Borland. Although that is against my policy for the books, and I told my publisher not to allow it to happen again, I chose to allow it to continue this time rather than create hardship for Trolltech at a late stage in their book production. I also recently recommended Qtopia to a consulting customer, for what could be a billion-dollar project. I point this out so that you might have some clue that I am not an anti-Qt ogre.

I am carrying on the UserLinux development, and am currently working on the installer. Others are also pursuing much constructive work, as is visible now on our mailing list.

Many Thanks

Bruce Perens

 

About Bruce Perens
Bruce Perens, a leader in the free software and open source community, is a member of the International Advisory Board of Linux.SYS-CON.com. He is the creator of the Open Source Definition, the manifesto of the open source movement. Bruce is founder or cofounder of the Open Source Initiative, the Linux Standard Base, Software in the Public Interest, and No-Code International. He is the creator of Busybox, which has spawned its own development community and is part of most commercial devices using embedded Linux.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 3

I understand how one could come to a decision like this, but personally, it all seems a power trip to me. I don't use kde or gnome, although I do keep recent installations of both. And the little that I have used them, I can't logically see _any_ reason gnome could be thought of as superior, but in that respect I may just be biased. Also, I don't know _any_ one person from any technical background that prefers gnome, I mean, the consensus just seems to scream kde. On the business side of things, I don't think small royalties *if that is really the case with qt* would stop any business from developing with it. I would think if nothing else that they would be used to it by now with propriety systems, almost everything seems to warrent royalties to someone nowadays on ms platforms. plus seeing how superior qt is to gtk in many aspects, it would be worth it anyway. Sorry gtk, your nice, but qt is more polished. Why attack qt simply because they expect to make SOME income off of their work? But this seems to be the root of all trouble with linux, the concept of ever having to PAY for something useful on linux is just "below" everyone. At first I prefered gtk just because it seemed easier, but once I got in to gui programming a bit I quickly realized qt's worth, especially now that it is gpl or lgpl or whatever the hell it is. Wouldn't business users see this same thing? All in all, my main rant is simply that the decision didn't seem to have any true thought put in to it. No real world merit. It seems like he wanted to make things "easier", by going with what he prefered. But as a corporate client, having gnome as the perception of linux, which is what the gui is in effect, with its instability, its flat out ugliness, its user un-friendliness, I would never adopt linux, it just seems to have no concept of GUI friendliness. As an end note, in all honesty, I think lindows has a much better shot anyway. Not _just_ because they chose kde, but they seem to have a real idea of what normal people want. They limited the choices, but they did it right. And qt's licensing hasn't seemed to be a problem for them...I believe lindows has a shot of going after more than just a desktop market. After all, wont developers want to develope for an operating system that will be used on the desktop? Isn't it safe to assume thats where the money is? Then that of course would build to other markets *as far as lindows goes/could go*, etc, which seems to be the path MS took in a way. anyway, I'm done

I supports Mr.Perens decision fully. The objective of supporting one GUI over the other should not be based on liking of the individuals. Instead it should carry forward the 'free' message in the most obvious form 'freedom' rather than creating another digitial divide between developing and developed nations.

If I go by my personal choice, I like GNOME. And it just goes beyond KDE when you use Ximian version of GNOME (XD2). I'm not saying that everybody should use XD2 but it just shows how beautful and userfriendly can be a GNOME desktop. FYI, I once used KDE but found it too cluttered and XP type.

I prefer Qt for GUI programming because I think it's superior to GTK.
Dear Mr. Perens let the users choose what GUI to use.
If only GNOME can be chosen for UserLinux I will not choose UserLinux.

i certainly would hate to see a memory hog like GNOME which,
has a tendancy to crash, selected as the "official" GUI for
any distro. As a Corporate decision maker, my position will
be to deploy KDE as we already have. That also applies to
any others that fall within our sphere of influence.

Well, as a business user, I use KDE because it works better than GNOME. Reading these comments, I have learned that the two have equal technical merit. It appears that reliability is not longer a techical merit. What is it then? Reliability of operation seems to be just Eye Candy to some people, I can assure you it isn't so for business users.

The same thing happened to me with Evolution. The first time it mangled my calendar trying to sync with my Palm, I got rid of it and will not try it again for years because I just do not have the time to play around with this stuff. It is very difficult for me to get excited about GUIs and calendars these days, it's been around for years and you expect it to be really nice and to work.

It's sad that UserLinux folks are opening a new front here, dividing Linux Users on this tired, tired issue. This is not leadership, it is lack of vision.

practice exclusion and complement yourself
on such a good job.

bla bla bla

What Bruce is really saying is that he is choosing GNOME because proprietary developers can write proprietary programs into GNOME and get away with it. Any addition to KDE has to be GPLed* (see note below). So his thinking is that the business people will prefer to support GNOME for profit in the traditional (closed source) model.

He may be right. But, instead of "UserLinux", he should call it "BussinesLinux".

For us, the users, KDE is just fine, or better than GNOME (at least this far). I say this in spite of the fact that, at the beginning of the "Desktop Wars" I was firmly in the GNOME side (I think they were right on the lincense issue). When trolltech changed the Qt license, I sat at the fence for a long time. Lately, I am slowly leaning to the KDE side. Why? Because the desktop is, in practice, part of the OS. It should be free. It should provide a level playing field the way Linux (the kernel) does. Proprietary applications can be built on top of it, but should not be allowed to become part of it. KDE works that way.

For example, I prefer to code my personal *applications* with GTK+ (mainly because I like wxPython), but my applications run just fine in KDE. I can charge for them and make them proprietary, if I want to, and they will still run (legally) in KDE.

I understand the fear of having Qt being controlled by one company. But, hey, Qt is GPLed. Anyone can allways fork it if he/she wants to, and if he/she does so for a good and valid reason, the rest of us may support the fork.

I think RMS should reconsider what desktop deserves the support of the GNU project. GNOME was a good provisional tool to get a free desktop available. We now have it in KDE.

*Note: I am not 100% sure that any addition to KDE has to be GPLed. Maybe some one can tell us what happens if someone with a closed source version of Qt wants to add a closed source add-on to KDE. I hope they can't.

I am just Joe User. At this point I need the availability of both KDE and Gnome. I have applications that were written to X11 API's that work great in either UI, but other programs that were written specifically to KDE or to Gnome API's so to run those apps I have no choice which environment that they run in. I suggest ending the GUI wars by allowing users to choose the one they like best, and provide a KDE Runtime library for Gnome Users and Vice Versa. or one GUI Runtime library that includes both, so users don't have to switch back and forth.

If you developers had such a library could you not write apps that take advantage of the strong points of both environments? Just a thought.

As a mostly Windows user and a part time Linux User, I can tell you that from my experience, moving between a KDE based desktop and Windows on a regular basis is much smoother and less jarring than moving between a Windwos and Gnome based desktop. I spent time early on trying to work in the Gnome Desktop environment and found it a real slow down to have to gearshift between ways of working all the time. When someone clued me into KDE and I finally tried it, the GNOME desktop went into hibernation where it has stayed.

This having been said, the point that should be taken is that if this is a USerLinux, then it better look at who the user community is. If your aiming at the windows desktop, then anything that you can do mimic the environment that you are going after will enhance your point. THe KDE mimnics the windows desktop behavior, the GNOME I saw does not.

Drop off KDE - it's incorrect. Most of users choose this desktop manager. KDE it's a more dinamical project than GNOME. Most of last projects based on X, are based on Qt/KDE also (today i see the news about Konverter - "mencoder" [part of "mplayer"] frontend for KDE)...

The best solution it's an integration GTK/GTK+ and Qt/KDE libraries. And works on this have been started last week.

Drop off KDE - it's incorrect. Most of users choose this desktop manager. KDE it's a more dinamical project than GNOME. Most of last projects based on X, are based on Qt/KDE also (today i see the news about Konverter - "mencoder" [part of "mplayer"] frontend for KDE)...

The best solution it's an integration GTK/GTK+ and Qt/KDE libraries. And works on this have been started last week.

Drop off KDE - it's incorrect. Most of users choose this desktop manager. KDE it's a more dinamical project than GNOME. Most of last projects based on X, are based on Qt/KDE also (today i see the news about Konverter - "mencoder" [part of "mplayer"] frontend for KDE)...

The best solution it's an integration GTK/GTK+ and Qt/KDE libraries. And works on this have been started last week.

Bruce, Don't waste our time with a hamstrung distribution!

Svyatogor commented on 22 December 2003:

* Amazing! From what i remember this is the first distro doing anything like that!

What about Lindows? I thought they went just with KDE ;)

Most of the 'anti' comments on here seem to be based on the fact that, unlike most other distros, it will only offer 1 GUI instead of giving users the choice. Maybe I'm missing something but if he just wanted to give people the usual Gnome/KDE choice aren't there loads that offer that already?


Feedback Pages:


Presentation Slides
Traditional on-premises data centers have long been the domain of modern data platforms like Apache Hadoop, meaning companies who build thei...
Using new techniques of information modeling, indexing, and processing, new cloud-based systems can support cloud-based workloads previously...
IoT & Smart Cities Stories
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...



2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
Testimonials
This week I had the pleasure of delivering the opening keynote at Cloud Expo New York. It was amazing to be back in the great city of New York with thousands of cloud enthusiasts eager to learn about the next step on their journey to embracing a cloud-first worldl."
@SteveMar_Msft
 
How does Cloud Expo do it every year? Another INCREDIBLE show - our heads are spinning - so fun and informative."
@SOASoftwareInc
 
Thank you @ThingsExpo for such a great event. All of the people we met over the past three days makes us confident IoT has a bright future."
@Cnnct2me
 
One of the best conferences we have attended in a while. Great job, Cloud Expo team! Keep it going."

@Flexential


Who Should Attend?
Senior Technologists including CIOs, CTOs & Vps of Technology, Chief Systems Engineers, IT Directors and Managers, Network and Storage Managers, Enterprise Architects, Communications and Networking Specialists, Directors of Infrastructure.

Business Executives including CEOs, CMOs, & CIOs , Presidents & SVPs, Directors of Business Development , Directors of IT Operations, Product and Purchasing Managers, IT Managers.

Join Us as a Media Partner - Together We Can Enable the Digital Transformation!
SYS-CON Media has a flourishing Media Partner program in which mutually beneficial promotion and benefits are arranged between our own leading Enterprise IT portals and events and those of our partners.

If you would like to participate, please provide us with details of your website/s and event/s or your organization and please include basic audience demographics as well as relevant metrics such as ave. page views per month.

To get involved, email events@sys-con.com.

@ThingsExpo Blogs
Whenever a new technology hits the high points of hype, everyone starts talking about it like it will solve all their business problems. Blockchain is one of those technologies. According to Gartner's latest report on the hype cycle of emerging technologies, blockchain has just passed the peak of their hype cycle curve. If you read the news articles about it, one would think it has taken over the technology world. No disruptive technology is without its challenges and potential impediments that frequently get lost in the hype. The panel will discuss their perspective on what they see as th...
CloudEXPO New York 2018, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 12-13, 2018, in New York City and will bring together Cloud Computing, FinTech and Blockchain, Digital Transformation, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, AI and Machine Learning to one location.
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
Digital Transformation Blogs
Whenever a new technology hits the high points of hype, everyone starts talking about it like it will solve all their business problems. Blockchain is one of those technologies. According to Gartner's latest report on the hype cycle of emerging technologies, blockchain has just passed the peak of their hype cycle curve. If you read the news articles about it, one would think it has taken over the technology world. No disruptive technology is without its challenges and potential impediments that frequently get lost in the hype. The panel will discuss their perspective on what they see as th...
CloudEXPO New York 2018, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 12-13, 2018, in New York City and will bring together Cloud Computing, FinTech and Blockchain, Digital Transformation, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, AI and Machine Learning to one location.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Nutanix has been named "Platinum Sponsor" of CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO New York, which will take place November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Nutanix makes infrastructure invisible, elevating IT to focus on the applications and services that power their business. The Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Platform blends web-scale engineering and consumer-grade design to natively converge server, storage, virtualization and networking into a resilient, software-defined solution with rich machine intelligence.
CloudEXPO.TV
"Calligo is a cloud service provider with data privacy at the heart of what we do. We are a typical Infrastructure as a Service cloud provider but it's been des...
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the...